Evaluation of Management Control Systems in a Higher Education Institution with the Performance Management and Control

Ilse Maria Beuren, Silvio Aparecido Teixeira

Resumo


This study aims to investigate the structure and operation of management control systems for performance evaluation in a private higher education institution (HEI). To capture the structure and operation of Management Control Systems (MCS) of the HEI, the survey instrument proposed by Ferreira and Otley was used (2006), called Performance Management and Control (PMC). Thus, an adapted PMC structure questionnaire was sent to 55 managers responsible for strategic actions and plans established in the business of the HEI, having 48 answered questionnaires. Also, four out of the five directors of the business school of the HEI were interviewed, besides the documentary research, for the triangulation of data and to validate the results. In data analysis, the techniques of descriptive statistics and information entropy were used. The results show that the overall level of performance evaluation for MCS reached a mean of 3.62 on the scale, less than partial agreement on the items presented. Some weaknesses were pointed out in the system used, and it was also denoted the need for better alignment among strategy, performance and control. It is concluded that the adapted PMC structure questionnaire managed to capture the structure and operation of MCS for performance evaluation in the HEI.

Palavras-chave


Performance evaluation; Management Control Systems; Performance Management and Control; Higher Education Institution

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF

Referências


Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system redesigns: the impact of institutional process on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 569-606.

Anthony, R. (1965). Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Pizzini, M. J. (2004). The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 1-23.

Briers, M., & Hirst, M. (1990). The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 373-398.

Bryant, L., Jones, D. A., & Widener, S. K. (2004). Managing value creation within the firm: an examination of multiple performance measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 107-132.

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127-168.

Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2007). Multiple perspectives of performance measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266-282.

Covaleski, M. A., Evans III, J. H., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15(3), 3-47.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2006). The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282.

Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. (1985). Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(1), 51-66.

Gupta, A. K. (1987). SBU strategies, corporate-SBU, and SBU effectiveness in strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 477-500.

Gupta, A .K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25-41.

Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B., Money, A. H., & Samuel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Horngren, C. T., Foster, G., & Datar, S. (2000). Contabilidade de custos. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. E. (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 205-238.

Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Meyer, M. W. (2003). Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 725-758.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). The strategy focused organization: how Balanced Scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207-232.

Langfield-Smith, K., Thorne, H. T., & Hilton, R. W. (2006). Management Accounting: information for managing and creating value. 4 ed. North Ryde, Australia: McGraw-Hill.

Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1995). Measure up! yardsticks for continuous improvement. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Inc.

Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 47-90.

Malmi, T., & Brown, D. (2008). Management control systems as a package – opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300.

Martins, G. A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. 2 ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.

McNair, C. J., Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1990). Do financial and nonfinancial performance measures have to agree? Management Accounting Research, 72(5), 28-36.

Merchant, K. A., & Van Der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management control systems. 2. ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Miles, R. W.; Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Neely, A., & Adams, C. (2001). Perspectives on performance: the performance prism. Journal of Cost Management, 15(1), 7-15.

Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, K. (2002). The performance prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Noreen, E. (1988). The economics of ethics: a new perspective on agency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(4), 359-369.

Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(10), 363-382.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.

Schwartz, G. (1970). Science in marketing. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Spendolini, M. (1992). The benchmarking book. New York, NY: Amacon.

Vieira, R., Major, M. J., & Robalo, R. (2009). Investigação qualitativa em Contabilidade. In: Major, M. J., & Vieira, R. (Ed.). Contabilidade e controlo de gestão: teoria, metodologia e prática. Lisboa: Escolar Editora. 2009. pp 301-331.

Yin, R. K. (2010). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.